Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||25 July 2009|
|PDF File Size:||4.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The author as a protagonist The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial.
Instituciknal would be to try to adjust a way to understand and act from certain ideas adopted as references and, in that sense, would have to be adopted by others.
It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect of it. For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary.
Books by Rene Lourau
To analyze the place occupied by them, their practices of knowledge-power as producers of lourua, their effects and what they put into operation, is to break with the logic of permanent naturalization of the process of institutionalization. The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities.
It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications. It is not a mechanical exercise, a factual record, but the construction of a look that does not precede the writing, involving itself in it, evidencing everything that moves it.
References Castro, E Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation.
Diário de campo: autor como protagonista
However, it was in the diary’s writing that the predictable lost focus, disrupting the normalized places. With tears in her eyes, a children’s teacher reads in her field diary the scene that destabilized her: Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and ahalisis approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political.
In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries analisiss a relationship that has as a horizon the horizontality, the self-management.
These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Análisis institucional y socioanálisis – Google Books
instituciomal This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: Foucault understands truth as a relation of power, differing from the act of looking at insyitucional as something to be discovered and accepted, insofar as truth responds to a set of rules and procedures, which produce discourses. Como citar este artigo. In this abyss the diary projects us when converted into an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling.
The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: The analysis can only be creative if it is free to circulate between possibilities not perceived or not summoned in the act of registration.
They enter into the game of thinking the people, with their affections and knowledge, not to deny what was done, but to denature it by overflowing unprecedented limits. The sense of objectivity opposed to that of subjectivity is fundamental to discriminate all that the mind creates, of what the mind must grasp and evidence. Compulsory schooling, the ways in which relationships are established in this family, the imposition by the school of family tasks as a condition for the performance of pedagogical activities From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted.
For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: What sustains a record of the social fact is its objectivity.
To build an intervention from the institutional analysis is to produce an unstable and open field of analysis, which operates through the institutions crossed by it. That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p. For this reason, Lourau affirms that the field diary in a socioanalytic intervention is not an intimate exercise, but a collective movement – less by the fingers that write the text and more by the ideas that compose it.
Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can help to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as institucionzl by Durkheim.
An epistemological movement that questions not the fact as a given and unquestionable reality, but the historical conditions of production of true knowledge that will define what the fact is and which effects it has.
It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in anailsis enchainment of meanings.